Mushaf View — Surah 2 2:103
About this view. Tafsir al-Tabari, al-Qurtubi, and al-Baghawi — three of the most chain-citing classical Sunni mufassirun — have never been fully translated into English. ParallelQuran's English Mushaf view shows the five most-complete English-language Sunni tafsirs available today. The Arabic Mushaf view (Phase 2) will show the full classical stack.
Proofs of Muhammad's ﷺ Prophethood
Imam Abu Ja`far bin Jarir said that Allah's statement,
وَلَقَدْ أَنزَلْنَآ إِلَيْكَ ءَايَـتٍ بَيِّنَـتٍ
(And indeed We have sent down to you manifest Ayat) means, "We have sent to you, O Muhammad, clear signs that testify to your prophethood." These Ayat are contained in the Book of Allah (Qur'an) which narrates the secrets of the knowledge that the Jews possess, which they hid, and the stories of their earlier generations. The Book of Allah also mentions the texts in the Books of the Jews that are known to only the rabbis and scholars, and the sections where they altered and distorted the rulings of the Tawrah. Since Allah mentioned all of this in His Book revealed to His Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, then this fact alone should be enough evidence for those who are truthful with themselves and who wish to avoid bringing themselves to destruction due to envy and transgression. Further human instict testifies to the truth that Muhammad was sent with and the clear signs that he brought which he did not learn or acquire from mankind. Ad-Dahhak said that Ibn `Abbas said that,
وَلَقَدْ أَنزَلْنَآ إِلَيْكَ ءَايَـتٍ بَيِّنَـتٍ
(And indeed We have sent down to you manifest Ayat) means, "You recite and convey this Book to them day and night, although you are an Ummi (unlettered) who never read a book. Yet, you inform them of what they have (in their own Books). Allah stated that this fact should serve as an example, a clear sign and a proof against them, if they but knew."
The Jews break Their Covenants
When the Messenger of Allah ﷺ was sent and Allah reminded the Jews of the covenant that they had with Him, especially concerning Muhammad ﷺ , Malik bin As-Sayf said, "By Allah! Allah never made a covenant with us about Muhammad ﷺ, nor did He take a pledge from us at all." Allah then revealed,
أَوَكُلَّمَا عَـهَدُواْ عَهْدًا نَّبَذَهُ فَرِيقٌ مِّنْهُم
(Is it not (the case) that every time they make a covenant, some party among them throw it aside) Al-Hasan Al-Basri said that Allah's statement,
بَلْ أَكْثَرُهُمْ لاَ يُؤْمِنُونَ
(Nay! (the truth is:) most of them believe not) means, "There is not a promise that they make, but they break it and abandon it. They make a promise today and break it tomorrow."
The Jews abandoned the Book of Allah and practiced Magic
As-Suddi commented on,
وَلَمَّا جَآءَهُمْ رَسُولٌ مِّنْ عِندِ اللَّهِ مُصَدِّقٌ لِّمَا مَعَهُمْ
(And when there came to them a Messenger from Allah (i.e. Muhammad ) confirming what was with them), "When Muhammad ﷺ came to them, they wanted to contradict and dispute with him using the Tawrah. However, the Tawrah and the Qur'an affirmed each other. So the Jews gave up on using the Torah, and took to the Book of Asaf, and the magic of Harut and Marut, which indeed did not conform to the Qur'an. Hence Allah's statement,
كَأَنَّهُمْ لاَ يَعْلَمُونَ
(As if they did not know!)."
Also, Qatadah said that Allah's statement,
كَأَنَّهُمْ لاَ يَعْلَمُونَ
(As if they did not know!) means, "They knew the truth but abandoned it, hid it and denied the fact that they even had it."
Magic existed before Sulayman (Solomon)
As-Suddi said that Allah's statement,
وَاتَّبَعُواْ مَا تَتْلُواْ الشَّيَـطِينُ عَلَى مُلْكِ سُلَيْمَـنَ
(They followed what the Shayatin (devils) gave out (falsely of the magic) in the lifetime of Sulayman) means, "`During the time of Prophet Solomon.' Beforehand, the devils used to ascend to heaven and eavesdrop on the conversations of the angels about what will occur on the earth regarding death, other incidents or unseen matters. They would convey this news to the soothsayers, and the soothsayers would in turn convey the news to the people. The people would believe what the soothsayers told them as being true. When the soothsayers trusted the devils, the devils started to lie to them and added other words to the true news that they heard, to the extent of adding seventy false words to each true word. The people recorded these words in some books. Soon after, the Children of Israel said that the Jinns know matters of the Unseen. When Solomon was sent as a Prophet, he collected these books in a box and buried it under his throne; any devil that dared get near the box was burned. Solomon said, `I will not hear of anyone who says that the devils know the Unseen, but I will cut off his head.' When Solomon died and the scholars who knew the truth about Solomon perished, there came another generation. To them, the devil materialized in the shape of a human and said to some of the Children of Israel, `Should I lead you to a treasure that you will never be able to use up' They said. `Yes.' He said, `Dig under this throne,' and he went with them and showed them Solomon's throne. They said to him, `Come closer.' He said, `No. I will wait for you here, and if you do not find the treasure then kill me. ' They dug and found the buried books, and Satan said to them, `Solomon only controlled the humans, devils and birds with this magic.' Thereafter, the news that Solomon was a sorcerer spread among the people, and the Children of Israel adopted these books. When Muhammad ﷺ came, they disputed with him relying on these books. Hence Allah's statement,
وَمَا كَفَرَ سُلَيْمَـنُ وَلَـكِنَّ الشَّيْاطِينَ كَفَرُواْ
(Sulayman did not disbelieve, but the Shayatin (devils) disbelieved).
The Story of Harut and Marut, and the Explanation that They were Angels
Allah said,
وَمَآ أُنزِلَ عَلَى الْمَلَكَيْنِ بِبَابِلَ هَـرُوتَ وَمَـرُوتَ وَمَا يُعَلِّمَانِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ حَتَّى يَقُولاَ إِنَّمَا نَحْنُ فِتْنَةٌ فَلاَ تَكْفُرْ فَيَتَعَلَّمُونَ مِنْهُمَا مَا يُفَرِّقُونَ بِهِ بَيْنَ الْمَرْءِ وَزَوْجِهِ
(And such things that came down at Babylon to the two angels, Harut and Marut, but neither of these two (angels) taught anyone (such things) till they had said, "We are for trial, so disbelieve not (by learning this magic from us)." And from these (angels) people learn that by which they cause separation between man and his wife).
There is a difference of opinion regarding this story. It was said that this Ayah denies that anything was sent down to the two angels, as Al-Qurtubi stated and then referred to the Ayah,
وَمَا كَفَرَ سُلَيْمَـنُ
(Sulayman did not disbelieve) saying, "The negation applies in both cases. Allah then said,
وَلَـكِنَّ الشَّيْاطِينَ كَفَرُواْ يُعَلِّمُونَ النَّاسَ السِّحْرَ وَمَآ أُنزِلَ عَلَى الْمَلَكَيْنِ
(But the Shayatin (devils) disbelieved, teaching men magic and such things that came down at Babylon to the two angels).
The Jews claimed that Gabriel and Michael brought magic down to the two angels, but Allah refuted this false claim."
Also, Ibn Jarir reported, that Al-`Awfi said that Ibn `Abbas said about Allah's statement,
وَمَآ أُنزِلَ عَلَى الْمَلَكَيْنِ بِبَابِلَ
(And such things that came down at Babylon to the two angels)
"Allah did not send magic down."
Also, Ibn Jarir narrated that Ar-Rabi` bin Anas said about,
وَمَآ أُنزِلَ عَلَى الْمَلَكَيْنِ
(And such things that came down to the two angels), "Allah did not send magic down to the them." Ibn Jarir commented, "This is the correct explanation for this Ayah.
وَاتَّبَعُواْ مَا تَتْلُواْ الشَّيَـطِينُ عَلَى مُلْكِ سُلَيْمَـنَ
(They followed what the Shayatin (devils) gave out (falsely) in the lifetime of Sulayman.) meaning, magic. However, neither did Solomon disbelieve nor did Allah send magic with the two angels. The devils, on the other hand, disbelieved and taught magic to the people of the Babylon of Harut and Marut."
Ibn Jarir continued; "If someone asks about explaining this Ayah in this manner, we say that,
وَاتَّبَعُواْ مَا تَتْلُواْ الشَّيَـطِينُ عَلَى مُلْكِ سُلَيْمَـنَ
(They followed what the Shayatin (devils) gave out (falsely) in the lifetime of Sulayman.) means, magic. Solomon neither disbelieved nor did Allah send magic with the two angels. However, the devils disbelieved and taught magic to the people in the Babylon of Harut and Marut, meaning Gabriel and Michael, for Jewish sorcerers claimed that Allah sent magic by the words of Gabriel and Michael to Solomon, son of David. Allah denied this false claim and stated to His Prophet Muhammad ﷺ that Gabriel and Michael were not sent with magic. Allah also exonerated Solomon from practicing magic, which the devils taught to the people of Babylon by the hands of two men, Harut and Marut. Hence, Harut and Marut were two ordinary men (not angels or Gabriel or Michael)." These were the words of At-Tabari, and this explanation is not plausible.
Many among the Salaf, said that Harut and Marut were angels who came down from heaven to earth and did what they did as the Ayah stated. To conform this opinion with the fact that the angels are immune from error, we say that Allah had eternal knowledge what these angels would do, just as He had eternal knowledge that Iblis would do as he did, while Allah refered to him being among the angels,
وَإِذْ قُلْنَا لِلْمَلَـئِكَةِ اسْجُدُواْ لأَدَمَ فَسَجَدُواْ إِلاَّ إِبْلِيسَ أَبَى
(And (remember) when We said to the angels: "Prostrate yourselves before Adam." And they prostrated except Iblis (Satan), he refused) (20:116) and so forth. However, what Harut and Marut did was less evil than what Iblis, may Allah curse him, did. Al-Qurtubi reported this opinion from `Ali, Ibn Mas`ud, Ibn `Abbas, Ibn `Umar, Ka`b Al-Ahbar, As-Suddi and Al-Kalbi.
Learning Magic is Kufr
Allah said,
وَمَا يُعَلِّمَانِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ حَتَّى يَقُولاَ إِنَّمَا نَحْنُ فِتْنَةٌ فَلاَ تَكْفُرْ
(But neither of these two (angels) taught anyone (such things) till they had said, "We are for trial, so disbelieve not (by learning this magic from us).)
Abu Ja`far Ar-Razi said that Ar-Rabi' bin Anas said that Qays bin `Abbad said that Ibn `Abbas said, "When someone came to the angels to learn magic, they would discourage him and say to him, `We are only a test, so do not fall into disbelief.' They had knowledge of what is good and evil and what constitutes belief or disbelief, and they thus knew that magic is a form of disbelief. When the person who came to learn magic still insisted on learning it, they commanded him to go to such and such place, where if he went, Satan would meet him and teach him magic. When this man would learn magic, the light (of faith) would depart him, and he would see it shining (and flying away) in the sky. He would then proclaim, `O my sorrow! Woe unto me! What should I do." Al-Hasan Al-Basri said that this Ayah means, "The angels were sent with magic, so that the people whom Allah willed would be tried and tested. Allah made them promise that they would not teach anyone until first proclaiming, `We are a test for you, do not fall into disbelief."' It was recorded by Ibn Abi Hatim. Also, Qatadah said, "Allah took their covenant to not teach anyone magic until they said, `We are a test. Therefore, do not fall in disbelief."'
Also, As-Suddi said, "When a man would come to the two angels they would advise him, `Do not fall into disbelief. We are a test. ' When the man would ignore their advice, they would say, `Go to that pile of ashes and urinate on it.' When he would urinate on the ashes, a light, meaning the light of faith, would depart from him and would shine until it entered heaven. Then something black that appeared to be smoke would descend and enter his ears and the rest of his body, and this is Allah's anger. When he told the angels what happened, they would teach him magic. So Allah's statement,
وَمَا يُعَلِّمَانِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ حَتَّى يَقُولاَ إِنَّمَا نَحْنُ فِتْنَةٌ فَلاَ تَكْفُرْ
(But neither of these two (angels) taught anyone (such things) till they had said, "We are for trial, so disbelieve not (by learning this magic from us).)
Sunayd said that Hajjaj said that Ibn Jurayj commented on this Ayah (2:102), "No one dares practice magic except a disbeliever. As for the Fitnah, it involves trials and freedom of choice."The scholars who stated that learning magic is disbelief relied on this Ayah for evidence. They also mentioned the Hadith that Abu Bakr Al-Bazzar recorded from `Abdullah, which states,
«مَنْ أَتَى كَاهِنًا أَوْ سَاحِرًا فَصَدَّقَهُ بِمَا يَقُولُ فَقَدْ كَفَر بِمَا أُنْزِلَ عَلى مُحَمَّدٍصلى الله عليه وسلّم»
(Whoever came to a soothsayer or a sorcerer and believed in what he said, will have disbelieved in what Allah revealed to Muhammad .)
This Hadith has an authentic chain of narration and there are other Hadiths which support it.
Causing a Separation between the Spouses is One of the Effects of Magic
Allah said,
فَيَتَعَلَّمُونَ مِنْهُمَا مَا يُفَرِّقُونَ بِهِ بَيْنَ الْمَرْءِ وَزَوْجِهِ
(And from these (angels) people learn that by which they cause separation between man and his wife,) This means, "The people learned magic from Harut and Marut and indulged in evil acts that included separating spouses, even though spouses are close to, and intimately associate with each other. This is the devil's work." Muslim recorded that Jabir bin `Abdullah said that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said,
«إِنَّ الشَّيْطَانَ لَيَضَعُ عَرْشَهُ عَلَى الْمَاءِ ثُمَّ يَبْعَثُ سَرَايَاهُ فِي النَّاسِ فَأَقْرَبُهُمْ عِنْدَهُ مَنْزِلَةً أَعْظَمُهُمْ عِنْدَهُ فِتْنَةً وَيَجِيءُ أَحَدُهُمْ فَيَقُولُ: مَا زِلْتُ بِفُلَانٍ حَتَّى تَرَكْتُهُ وَهُوَ يَقُولُ كَذَا وَكَذَا، فَيَقُولُ إِبْلِيسُ: لَا وَاللهِ مَا صَنَعْتَ شَيْئًا، وَيَجِيءُ أَحَدُهُمْ فَيَقُولُ: مَا تَرَكْتُهُ حَتّى فَرَّقْتُ بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَ أَهْلِهِ، قَالَ: فَيُقرِّبُهُ وَيُدْنِيهِ وَيَلْتَزِمُهُ وَيَقُولُ: نِعْمَ أَنْت»
(Satan erects his throne on water and sends his emissaries among the people. The closest person to him is the person who causes the most Fitnah. One of them (a devil) would come to him and would say, `I kept inciting so-and-so, until he said such and such words.' Iblis says, `No, by Allah, you have not done much.' Another devil would come to him and would say, `I kept inciting so-and-so, until I separated between him and his wife.' Satan would draw him closer and embrace him, saying, `Yes, you did well.')
Separation between a man and his wife occurs here because each spouse imagines that the other spouse is ugly or ill-mannered, etc.
Allah's Appointed Term supercedes Everything
Allah said,
وَمَا هُم بِضَآرِّينَ بِهِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ إِلاَّ بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ
(But they could not thus harm anyone except by Allah's leave). Sufyan Ath-Thawri commented, "Except by Allah's appointed term." Further, Al-Hasan Al-Basri said that,
وَمَا هُم بِضَآرِّينَ بِهِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ إِلاَّ بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ
(But they could not thus harm anyone except by Allah's leave) means, "Allah allows magicians to adversely affect whomever He wills and saves whomever He wills from them. Sorcerers never bring harm to anyone except by Allah's leave." Allah's statement,
وَيَتَعَلَّمُونَ مَا يَضُرُّهُمْ وَلاَ يَنفَعُهُمْ
(And they learn that which harms them and profits them not.) means, it harms their religion and does not have a benefit compared to its harm.
وَلَقَدْ عَلِمُواْ لَمَنِ اشْتَرَاهُ مَا لَهُ فِى الاٌّخِرَةِ مِنْ خَلَـقٍ
(And indeed they knew that the buyers of it (magic) would have no (Khalaq) share in the Hereafter.) meaning, "The Jews who preferred magic over following the Messenger of Allah ﷺ knew that those who commit the same error shall have no Khalaq in the Hereafter." Ibn `Abbas, Mujahid and As-Suddi stated that `no Khalaq' means, `no share.'
Allah then said,
وَاتَّبَعُواْ مَا تَتْلُواْ الشَّيَـطِينُ عَلَى مُلْكِ سُلَيْمَـنَ وَمَا كَفَرَ سُلَيْمَـنُ وَلَـكِنَّ الشَّيْاطِينَ كَفَرُواْ يُعَلِّمُونَ النَّاسَ السِّحْرَ وَمَآ أُنزِلَ عَلَى الْمَلَكَيْنِ بِبَابِلَ هَـرُوتَ وَمَـرُوتَ وَمَا يُعَلِّمَانِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ حَتَّى يَقُولاَ إِنَّمَا نَحْنُ فِتْنَةٌ فَلاَ تَكْفُرْ فَيَتَعَلَّمُونَ مِنْهُمَا مَا يُفَرِّقُونَ بِهِ بَيْنَ الْمَرْءِ وَزَوْجِهِ وَمَا هُم بِضَآرِّينَ بِهِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ إِلاَّ بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ وَيَتَعَلَّمُونَ مَا يَضُرُّهُمْ وَلاَ يَنفَعُهُمْ وَلَقَدْ عَلِمُواْ لَمَنِ اشْتَرَاهُ مَا لَهُ فِى الاٌّخِرَةِ مِنْ خَلَـقٍ وَلَبِئْسَ مَا شَرَوْاْ بِهِ أَنفُسَهُمْ لَوْ كَانُواْ يَعْلَمُونَ - وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ ءَامَنُواْ واتَّقَوْا لَمَثُوبَةٌ مِّنْ عِندِ اللَّهِ خَيْرٌ لَّوْ كَانُواْ يَعْلَمُونَ
(And how bad indeed was that for which they sold their own selves, if they but knew. And if they had believed and guarded themselves from evil and kept their duty to Allah, far better would have been the reward from their Lord, if they but knew!). Allah stated, o
وَلَبِئْسَ
(And how bad) meaning, what they preferred, magic, instead of faith and following the Messenger, if they but comprehend the advice.
وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ ءَامَنُواْ واتَّقَوْا لَمَثُوبَةٌ مِّنْ عِندِ اللَّهِ خَيْرٌ
(And if they had believed and guarded themselves from evil and kept their duty to Allah, far better would have been the reward from their Lord,) meaning, "Had they believed in Allah and His Messenger and avoided the prohibitions, then Allah's reward for these good deeds would have been better for them than what they chose and preferred for themselves." Similarly, Allah said,
وَقَالَ الَّذِينَ أُوتُواْ الْعِلْمَ وَيْلَكُمْ ثَوَابُ اللَّهِ خَيْرٌ لِّمَنْ ءَامَنَ وَعَمِلَ صَـلِحاً وَلاَ يُلَقَّاهَآ إِلاَّ الصَّـبِرُونَ
(But those who had been given (religious) knowledge said: "Woe to you! The reward of Allah (in the Hereafter) is better for those who believe and do righteous good deeds, and this none shall attain except As-Sabirun (the patient in following the truth).") (28:80).
يقول تعالى "ولبئس" البديل ما استبدلوا به من السحر عوضا عن الإيمان ومتابعة الرسول لو كان لهم علم بما وعظوا به "ولو أنهم آمنوا واتقوا لمثوبة من عند الله خير" أي ولو أنهم آمنوا بالله ورسله واتقوا المحارم لكان مثوبة الله على ذلك خيرا لهم مما استخاروا لأنفسهم ورضوا به كما قال تعالى "وقال الذين أوتوا العلم ويلكم ثواب الله خير لمن آمن وعمل صالحا ولا يلقاها إلا الصابرون". وقد استدل بقوله "ولو أنهم آمنوا واتقوا" من ذهب إلى تكفير الساحر كما هو رواية عن الإمام أحمد بن حنبل وطائفة من السلف وقيل بل لا يكفر ولكن حده ضرب عنقه لما رواه الشافعي وأحمد بن حنبل قالا: أخبرنا سفيان هو ابن عيينة عن عمرو بن دينار أنه سمع بجلة بن عبدة يقول كتب عمر بن الخطاب - رضي الله عنه - أن اقتلوا كل ساحر وساحرة قال فقتلنا ثلاث سواحر وقد أخرجه البخاري في صحيحه أيضا وهكذا صح أن حفصة أم المؤمنين سحرتها جارية لها فأمرت بها فقتلت قال الإمام أحمد بن حنبل صح عن ثلاثة من أصحاب النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - في قتل الساحر وروى الترمذي من حديث إسماعيل بن مسلم عن الحسن عن جندب الأزدي أنه قال: قال رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - "حد الساحر ضربه بالسيف" ثم قالا لا نعرفه مرفوعا إلا من هذا الوجه وإسماعيل بن مسلم يضعف في الحديث والصحيح عن الحسن عن جندب موقوفا قلت قد رواه الطبراني من وجه آخر عن الحسن عن جندب مرفوعا والله أعلم وقد روي من طرق متعددة أن الوليد بن عقبة كان عنده ساحر يلعب بين يديه فكان يضرب رأس الرجل ثم يصيح به فيرد إليه رأسه فقال الناس سبحان الله يحيي الموتى ورآه رجل من صالحي المهاجرين فلما كان الغد جاء مشتملا على سيفه وذهب يلعب لعبه ذلك فاخترط الرجل سيفه فضرب عنق الساحر وقال: إن كان صادقا فليحي نفسه وتلا قوله تعالى "أتأتون السحر وأنتم تبصرون" فغضب الوليد إذ لم يستأذنه في ذلك فسجنه ثم أطلقه والله أعلم وقال الإمام أبو بكر الخلال: أخبرنا عبدالله بن أحمد بن حنبل حدثني أبي أخبرنا يحيى بن سعيد حدثني أبو إسحق عن حارثة قال كان عند بعض الأمراء الرجل يلعب فجاء جندب مشتملا على سيفه فقتله قال أراه كان ساحرا وحمل الشافعي رحمه الله قصة عمر وحفصة على سحر يكون شركا والله أعلم. " فصل "حكى أبو عبدالله الرازي في تفسيره عن المعتزلة أنهم أنكروا وجود السحر قال: وربما كفروا من اعتقد وجوده قال وأما أهل السنة فقد جوزوا أن يقدر الساحر أن يطير في الهواء ويقلب الإنسان حمارا والحمار إنسانا إلا أنهم قالوا إن الله يخلق الأشياء عندما يقول الساحر تلك الرقى والكلمات المعينة فأما أن يكون المؤثر في ذلك هو الفلك والنجوم فلا خلافا للفلاسفة والمنجمين والصابئة ثم استدل على وقوع السحر وأنه بخلق الله تعالى بقوله تعالى "وما هم بضارين به من أحد إلا بإذن الله" ومن الأخبار بأن رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - سحر وأن السحر عمل فيه وبقصة تلك المرأة مع عائشة رضي الله عنها وما ذكرت تلك المرأة من إتيانها بابل وتعلمها السحر. قال وبما يذكر في هذا الباب من الحكايات الكثيرة ثم قال بعد هذا. " المسألة الخامسة "في أن العلم بالسحر ليس بقبيح ولا محظور- اتفق المحققون على ذلك لأن العلم لذاته شريف وأيضا لعموم قوله تعالى "قل هل يستوي الذين يعلمون والذين لا يعلمون" ولأن السحر لو لم يكن يعلم لما أمكن الفرق بينه وبين المعجزة والعلم يكون المعجز معجزا واجب وما يتوقف الواجب عليه فهو واجب فهذا يقتضي أن يكون تحصيل العلم بالسحر واجبا وما يكون واجبا فكيف يكون حراما وقبيحا؟ هذا لفظه بحروفه في هذه المسألة وهذا الكلام فيه نظر من وجوه أحدها قوله: العلم بالسحر ليس بقبيح إن عني به ليس بقبيح عقلا فمخالفوه من المعتزلة يمنعون هذا وإن عني أنه ليس بقبيح شرعا ففي هذه الآية الكريمة تبشيع لتعلم السحر وفي الصحيح "من أتى عرافا أو كاهنا فقد كفر بما أنزل على محمد" وفي السنن "من عقد عقدة ونفث فيها فقد سحر" وقوله ولا محظور اتفق المحققون على ذلك. كيف لا يكون محظورا مع ما ذكرناه من الآية والحديث واتفاق المحققين يقتضي أن يكون قد نص على هذه المسألة أئمة العلماء أو أكثرهم وأين نصوصهم على ذلك؟ ثم إدخاله علم السحر في عموم قوله تعالى " هل يستوي الذين يعلمون والذين لا يعلمون" فيه نظر لأن هذه الآية إنما دلت على مدح العالمين العلم الشرعي ولم قلت إن هذا منه ثم ترقيه إلى وجوب تعلمه بأنه لا يحصل العلم بالمعجز إلا به ضعيف بل فاسد لأن أعظم معجزات رسولنا عليه الصلاة والسلام هي القرآن العظيم الذي لا يأتيه الباطل من بين يديه ولا من خلفه تنزيل من حكيم حميد. ثم إن العلم بأنه معجز لا يتوقف على علم السحر أصلا ثم من المعلوم بالضرورة أن الصحابة والتابعين وأئمة المسلمين وعامتهم كانوا يعلمون المعجز ويفرقون بينه وبين غيره ولم يكونوا يعلمون السحر ولا تعلموه ولا علموه والله أعلم. ثم قد ذكر أبو عبدالله الرازي أن أنواع السحر ثمانية "الأول" سحر الكذابين والكشدانيين الذين كانوا يعبدون الكواكب السبعة المتحيرة وهي السيارة وكانوا يعتقدون أنها مدبرة العالم وأنها تأتي بالخير والشر وهم الذين بعث الله إليهم إبراهيم الخليل - صلى الله عليه وسلم - مبطلا مقالتهم ورادا لمذهبهم وقد استقصى في " كتاب السر المكتوم في مخاطبة الشمس والنجوم "المنسوب إليه كما ذكرها القاضي ابن خلكان وغيره ويقال إنه تاب منه وقيل بل صنفه على وجه إظهار الفضيلة لا على سبيل الاعتقاد وهذا هو المظنون به إلا أنه ذكر فيه طريقهم في مخاطبة كل من هذه الكواكب السبعة وكيفية ما يفعلون وما يلبسونه وما يتمسكون به. قال "والنوع الثاني" سحر أصحاب الأوهام والنفوس القوية ثم استدل على أن الوهم له تأثير بأن الإنسان يمكنه أن يمشي على الجذع الموضوع على وجه الأرض ولا يمكنه المشي عليه إذا كان ممدودا على نهر أو نحوه قال: وكما أجمعت الأطباء على نهي المرعوف عن النظر إلى الأشياء الحمر والمصروع إلى الأشياء القوية اللمعان أو الدوران وما ذاك إلا لأن النفوس خلقت مطيعة للأوهام.قال:وقد اتفق العقلاء على أن الإصابة بالعين حق - وله أن يستدل على ذلك بما ثبت في الصحيح أن رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - قال: "العين حق ولو كان شيء سابق القدر لسبقته العين"- قال فإذا عرفت هذا فنقول النفس التي تفعل هذه الأفاعيل قد تكون قوية جدا فتستغني في هذه الأفاعيل عن الاستعانة بالآلات والأدوات وقد تكون ضعيفة فتحتاج إلى الاستعانة بهذه الآلات وتحقيقه أن النفس إذا كانت متعلية على البدن شديدة الانجذاب إلى عالم السموات صارت كأنها روح من الأرواح السماوية فكانت قوية على التأثير في مواد هذا العالم وإذا كانت ضعيفة شديدة التعلق بهذه اللذات البدنية فحينئذ لا يكون لها تأثير البتة إلا في هذا البدن ثم أرشد إلى مداواة هذا الداء بتقليل الغذاء والانقطاع عن الناس والرياء "قلت" وهذا الذي يشير إليه هو التصرف بالحال: وهو على قسمين تارة تكون حالا صحيحة شرعية يتصرف بها فيما أمر الله ورسوله صلى الله عييه وسلم. ويترك ما نهى الله تعالى عنه ورسوله - صلى الله عليه وسلم فهذه الأحوال مواهب من الله تعالى وكرامات للصالحين من هذه الأمة ولا يسمى هذا سحرا في الشرع. وتارة تكون الحال فاسدة لا يمتثل صاحبها ما أمر الله ورسوله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - ولا يتصرف بها في ذلك فهذه حال الأشقياء المخالفين للشريعة ولا يدل إعطاء الله إياهم هذه الأحوال على محبته لهم كما أن الدجال له من الخوارق العادات ما دلت عليه الأحاديث الكثيرة مع أنه مذموم شرعا لعنه الله وكذلك من شابهه من مخالفي الشريعة المحمدية على صاحبها أفضل الصلاة والسلام وبسط هذا يطول جدا وليس هذا موضعه. قال "والنوع الثالث" من السحر والاستعانة بالأرواح الأرضية وهم الجن خلافا للفلاسفة والمعتزلة وهم على قسمين. مؤمنون وكفار وهم الشياطين. قال واتصال النفوس الناطقة بها أسهل من اتصالها بالأرواح السماوية لما بينهما من المناسبة والقرب ثم إن أصحاب الصنعة وأرباب التجربة شاهدوا أن الاتصال بهذه الأرواح الأرضية يحصل بأعمال سهلة قليلة من الرقى والدخن والتجريد وهذا النوع هو المسمى بالعزائم وعمل التسخير. "النوع الرابع" من السحر التخييلات والأخذ بالعيون والشعبذة ومبناه على أن البصر قد يخطئ ويشتغل بالشيء المعين دون غيره ألا ترى ذا الشعبذة الحاذق يظهر عمل شيء يذهل أذهان الناظرين به ويأخذ عيونهم إليه حتى إذا استفرغهم الشغل بذلك الشيء بالتحديث ونحوه عمل شيئا آخر عملا بسرعة شديدة وحينئذ يظهر لهم شيء آخر غير ما انتظروه فيتعجبون منه جدا ولو أنه سكت ولم يتكلم بما يصرف الخواطر إلى ضد ما يريد أن يعمله ولم تتحرك النفوس والأوهام إلى غير ما يريد إخراجه لفطن الناظرون لكل ما يفعله "قال" وكلما كانت الأحوال تفيد حسن البصر نوعا من أنواع الخلل أشد كان العمل أحسن مثل أن يجلس المشعبذ في موضع مضيء جدا أو مظلم فلا تقف القوة الناظرة على أحوالها والحالة هذه. "قلت" وقد قال بعض المفسرين: إن سحر السحرة بين يدي فرعون إنما كان من باب الشعبذة ولهذا قال تعالى "فلما ألقوا سحروا أعين الناس واسترهبوهم وجاءوا بسحر عظيم" وقال تعالى "يخيل إليه من سحرهم أنها تسعى" قالوا: ولم تكن تسعى فى نفس الأمر والله أعلم. "النوع الخامس من السحر" الأعمال العجيبة التي تظهر من تركيب آلات مركبة على النسب الهندسية كفارس على فرس في يده بوق كلما مضت ساعة من النهار ضرب بالبوق من غير أن يمسه أحد- ومنها الصور التي تصورها الروم والهند حتى لا يفرق الناظر بينها وبين الإنسان حتى يصورونها ضاحكة وباكية إلى أن قال: فهذه الوجوه من لطيف أمور التخاييل قال: وكان سحر سحرة فرعون من هذا القبيل " قلت "يعني ما قاله بعض المفسرين: أنهم عمدوا إلى تلك الحبال والعصي فحشوها زئبقا فصارت تتلوى بسبب ما فيها من ذلك الزئبق فيخيل إلى الرائي أنها تسعى باختيارها قال الرازي: ومن هذا الباب تركيب صندوق الساعات ويندرج في هذا الباب علم جر الأثقال بالآلات الخفيفة قال: وهذا في الحقيقة لا ينبغي أن يعد من باب السحر لأن لها أسبابا معلومة يقينية من اطلع عليها قدر عليها " قلت "ومن هذا القبيل حيل النصارى على عامتهم بما يرونهم إياه من الأنوار كقضية قمامة الكنيسة التي لهم ببلد المقدس وما يحتالون به من إدخال النار خفية إلى الكنيسة وإشعال ذلك القنديل بصنعة لطيفة تروج على الطغام منهم وأما الخواص فهم معترفون بذلك ولكن يتأولون أنهم يجمعون شمل أصحابهم على دينهم فيرون ذلك سائغا لهم وفيهم شبهة على الجهلة الأغبياء من متعبدي الكرامية الذين يرون جواز وضع الأحاديث في الترغيب والترهيب فيدخلون في عداد من قال رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - فيهم "من كذب علي متعمدا فليتبوأ مقعده من النار" وقوله "حدثوا عني ولا تكذبوا علي فإنه من يكذب علي يلج النار" ثم ذكر ههنا حكاية عن بعض الرهبان وهو أنه سمع صوت طائر حزين الصوت ضعيف الحركة فإذا سمعته الطيور ترق له فتذهب فتلقي في وكره من ثمر الزيتون ليتبلغ به فعمد هذا الراهب إلى صنعة طائر على شكله وتوصل إلى أن جعله أجوف فإذا دخلته الريح يسمع منه صوت كصوت ذلك الطائر وانقطع في صومعة ابتناها وزعم أنها على قبر بعض صالحيهم وعلق الطائر في مكان منها فإذا كان زمان الزيتون فتح بابا من ناحيته فيدخل الريح إلى داخل هذه الصورة فيسمع صوتها كل طائر في شكله أيضا فتأتي الطيور فتحمل من الزيتون شيئا كثيرا فلا ترى النصارى إلا ذلك الزيتون فى هذه الصومعة ولا يدرون ما سببه ففتنهم بذلك وأوهم أن هذا من كرامات صاحب هذا القبر عليهم لعائن الله المتتابعة إلى يوم القيامة. " قال الرازي: النوع السادس من السحر "الاستعانة بخواص الأدوية يعني في الأطعمة والدهانات قال: واعلم أن لا سبيل إلى إنكار الخواص فإن تأثير المغناطيس مشاهد " قلت "يدخل في هذا القبيل كثير ممن يدعي الفقر ويتخيل على جهلة الناس بهذه الخواص مدعيا أنها أحوال له من مخالطة النيران ومسك الحيات إلى غير ذلك من المحالات. قال " النوع السابع من السحر "التعليق للقلب وهو أن يدعي الساحر أنه عرف الاسم الأعظم وأن الجن يطيعونه وينقادون له في أكثر الأمور إذا اتفق أن يكون ذلك السامع ضعيف العقل قليل التمييز اعتقد أنه حق وتعلق قلبه بذلك وحصل في نفسه نوع من الرعب والمخافة فإذا حصل الخوف ضعفت القوى الحساسة فحينئذ يتمكن الساحر أن يفعل ما يشاء " قلت "هذا النمط يقال له التنبلة وإنما يروج على الضعفاء العقول من بني آدم وفي علم الفراسة ما يرشد إلى معرفة كامل العقل من ناقصه فإذا كان النبيل حاذقا في علم الفراسة عرف من ينقاد له من الناس من غيره. قال " النوع الثامن من السحر" السعي بالنميمة التقريب من وجوه خفيفة لطيفة وذلك شائع في الناس " قلت " النميمة على قسمين تارة تكون على وجه التحريش بين الناس وتفريق قلوب المؤمنين فهذا حرام متفق عليه فأما إن كانت على وجه الإصلاح بين الناس وائتلاف كلمة المسلمين كما جاء في الحديث "ليس بالكذاب من ينم خيرا" أو يكون على وجه التخذيل والتفريق بين جموع الكفرة فهذا أمر مطلوب كما جاء في الحديث "الحرب خدعة " وكما فعل نعيم بن مسعود في تفريقه بين كلمة الأحزاب وبين قريظة: جاء إلى هؤلاء فنمى إليهم عن هؤلاء كلاما ونقل من هؤلاء إلى أولئك شيئا آخر ثم لأم بين ذلك فتناكرت النفوس وافترقت وإنما يحذو على مثل هذا الذكاء والبصيرة النافذة وبالله المستعان. ثم قال الرازي: فهذه جملة الكلام في أقسام السحر وشرح أنواعه وأصنافه " قلت "وإنما أدخل كثيرا من هذه الأنواع المذكورة في فن السحر للطافة مداركها لأن السحر في اللغة عبارة عما لطف وخفي سببه ولهذا جاء في الحديث "إن من البيان لسحرا" وسمي السحور لكونه يقع خفيا آخر الليل والسحر الرئة وهي محل الغذاء وسميت بذلك لخفائها ولطف مجاريها إلى أجزاء البدن وغضونه كما قال أبو جهل يوم بدر لعتبة: انتفخ سحره أي انتفخت رئته من الخوف وقالت عائشة رضي الله عنها: توفي رسول - صلى الله عليه وسلم - بين سحري ونحري وقال تعالى "سحروا أعين الناس" أي أخفوا عنهم عملهم والله أعلم. وقال أبو عبدالله القرطبي: وعندنا أن السحر حق وله حقيقة يخلق الله عنده ما يشاء خلافا للمعتزلة وأبي إسحق الإسفراييني من الشافعية حيث قالوا: إنه تمويه وتخييل قال: ومن السحر ما يكون بخفة اليد كالشعوذة والشعوذي البريد لخفة سيره قال ابن فارس: وليست هذه الكلمة من كلام أهل البادية قال القرطبي: ومنه ما يكون كلام يحفظ ورقى من أسماء الله تعالى وفد يكون من عهود الشياطين مكون أدوية وأدخنة وغير ذلك قال: وقوله عليه السلام "إن من البيان لسحرا" يحتمل أن يكون مدحا كما تقوله طائفة ويحتمل أن يكون ذما للبلاغة قال: وهذا أصح قال: لأنها تصوب الباطل حتى توهم السامع أنه حق كما قال عليه الصلاة والسلام "فلعل بعضكم أن يكون ألحن بحجته من بعض فأقضي له" الحديث. "فصل" وقد ذكر الوزير أبو المظفر يحيى بن محمد بن هبيرة رحمه الله في كتابه " الإشراف على مذاهب الأشراف " بابا في السحر فقال: أجمعوا على أن السحر له حقيقة إلا أبا حنيفة فإنه قال: لا حقيقة له عنده واختلفوا فيمن يتعلم السحر ويستعمله فقال أبو حنيفة ومالك وأحمد يكفر بذلك ومن أصحاب أبي حنيفة من قال: إن تعلمه ليتقيه أو ليجتنبه فلا يكفر ومن تعلمه معتقدا جوازه أو أنه ينفعه كفر وكذا من اعتقد أن الشياطين تفعل له ما يشاء فهو كافر وقال الشافعي رحمه الله إذا تعلم السحر قلنا له صف لنا سحرك فإن وصف ما يوجب الكفر مثل ما اعتقده أهل بابل من التقرب إلى الكواكب السبعة وأنها تفعل ما يلتمس منها فهو كافر وإن كان لا يوجب الكفر فإن اعتقد إباحته فهو كافر. قال ابن هبيرة: وهل يقتل بمجرد فعله واستعماله؟ فقال مالك وأحمد نعم وقال الشافعي وأبو حنيفة لا فأما إن قتل بسحره إنسانا فأنه يقتل عند مالك والشافعي وأحمد وقال أبو حنيفة: لا يقتل حتى يتكرر منه ذلك أو يقر بذلك في حق شخص معين وإذا قتل فإنه يقتل حدا عندهم إلا الشافعي فإنه قال يقتل والحالة هذه قصاصا قال وهل إذا تاب الساحر تقبل توبته؟ فقال مالك وأبو حنيفة وأحمد في المشهور عنهم: لا تقبل وقال الشافعي وأحمد في الرواية الأخرى تقبل وأما ساحر أهل الكتاب فعند أبي حنيفة أنه يقتل كما يقتل الساحر المسلم وقال مالك وأحمد والشافعي: لا يقتل يعني لقصة لبيد بن الأعصم واختلفوا في المسلمة الساحرة فعند أبي حنيفة أنها لا تقتل ولكن تحبس وقال الثلاثة: حكمها حكم الرجل والله أعلم وقال أبو بكر الخلال: أخبرنا أبو بكر المروزي قال قرأ على أبي عبدالله - يعني أحمد بن حنبل - عمر بن هرون أخبرنا يونس عن الزهري قال: يقتل ساحر المسلمين ولا يقتل ساحر المشركين لأن رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - سحرته امرأة من اليهود فلم يقتلها. وقد نقل القرطبي عن مالك رحمه الله أنه قال في الذمي يقتل إن قتل سحره وحكى ابن خويز منداد عن مالك روايتين فى الذمي إذا سحر: إحداهما أنه يستتاب فإن أسلم وإلا قتل والثانية أنه يقتل وإن أسلم وأما الساحر المسلم فإن تضمن سحره كفرا كفر عند الأئمة الأربعة وغيرهم لقوله تعالى "وما يعلمان من أحد حتى يقولا إنما نحن فتنة فلا تكفر" لكن قال مالك إذا ظهر عليه لم تقبل توبته لأنه كالزنديق فإن تاب قبل أن يظهر عليه وجاءنا تائبا قبلناه فإن قتل سحره قتل قال الشافعي: فإن قال لم أتعمد القتل فهو مخطئ تجب عليه الدية. "مسألة" وهل يسأل الساحر حلا لسحره فأجاز سعيد بن المسيب فيما نقله عنه البخاري وقال عامر الشعبي: لا بأس بالنشرة وكره ذلك الحسن البصري وفي الصحيح عن عائشة أنها قالت يا رسول الله هلا تنشرت فقال "أما الله فقد شفاني وخشيت أن أفتح على الناس شرا" وحكى القرطبي عن وهب: أنه قال يؤخذ سبع ورقات من سدر فتدق بين حجرين ثم تضرب بالماء ويقرأ عليها آية الكرسي ويشرب منها المسحور ثلاث حسوات ثم يغتسل بباقيه فإنه يذهب ما به وهو جيد للرجل الذي يؤخذ عن امرأته " قلت "أنفع ما يستعمل لإذهاب السحر ما أنزل الله على رسوله في إذهاب ذلك وهما المعوذتان وفي الحديث " لم يتعوذ المتعوذ بمثلهما " وكذلك قراءة الكرسي فإنها مطردة للشيطان.
(And if they) i.e. the Jews (had believed) in Muhammad and the Qur'an (and kept from evil) repented from Judaism and sorcery, (a recompense from Allah) a reward from Allah (would be better) than Judaism and sorcery, (if they only knew) if they believed in Allah's reward, but they do not know nor do they believe; and it is said that they knew all this from their Book.
أي لو آمنوا بمحمد واتقوا الله فلم يقدموا على إنكار ما بشرت به كتبهم لكانت لهم مثوبة من عند الله ، ومثوبة الله خير من كل نفع حملهم على المكابرة .و ( لو ) شرطية امتناعية اقترن شرطها بأن مع التزام الفعل الماضي في جملته على حد قول امرىء القيس :ولو أنّ ما أسعى لأدنى معيشةٍ ... كفاني ولم أطلب قليلٌ من المالو ( أن ) مع صلتها في محل مبتدأ عند جمهور البصريين وما في جمل الصلة من المسند والمسند إليه أكمل الفائدة فأغنى عن الخبر . وقيل خبرها محذوف تقديره ثابت أي ولو إيمانهم ثابت .وقوله : { لمثوبة } يترجح أن يكون جواب ( لو ) فإنه مقترن باللام التي يكثر اقتران جواب ( لو ) المثبت بها والجواب هنا جملة اسمية وهي لا تقع جواباً للو في الغالب وكان هذا الجواب غير ظاهر الترتب والتعليق على جملة الشرط لأن مثوبة الله خير سواء آمن اليهود واتقوا أم لم يفعلوا . قال بعض النحاة الجواب محذوف أي لأثيبوا ومثوبة من عند الله خير . وعدل عنه صاحب «الكشاف» فقال : أوثرت الجملة الاسمية في جواب ( لو ) على الفعلية لما في ذلك من الدلالة على ثبات المثوبة واستقرارها كما عدل عن النصب إلى الرفع في { سلام عليكم } [ الزمر : 73 ] لذلك اه . ومراده أن تقدير الجواب لأثيبوا مثوبة من الله خيراً لهم مما شروا به أنفسهم ، أو لمثوبةً بالنصب على أنه مصدر بدل من فعله ، وكيفما كان فالفعل أو بدله يدلان على الحدوث فلا دلالة له على الدوام والثبات . ولما كان المقام يقتضي حصول المثوبة وثباتها وثبات الخيرية لها ليحصل مجموع معان عدل عن النصب المؤذن بالفعل إلى الرفع لأن الجملة الاسمية لا تفيد الحدوث بل الثبوت ، وينتقل من إفادتها الثبوت إلى إفادة الدوام والثبات فدلالة الآية على ثبات المثوبة بالعدول عن نصب المصدر إلى رفعه كما في { سلام عليكم } و { الحمد لله } [ الفاتحة : 2 ] ودلالتها على ثبات نسبة الخيرية للمثوبة من كون النسبة مستفادة من جملة اسمية فصارت الجملة بمنزلة جملتين لأن أصل المصدر الآتي بدلاً من فعله أن يدل على نسبة لفاعله فلو قيل ( لمثوبةً ) بالنصب لكان تقديره لأثيبوا مثوبة فإذا حولت إلى المصدر المرفوع لزم أن تعتبر ما كان فيه من النسبة قبل الرفع ، ولما كان المصدر المرفوع لا نسبة فيه علم السامع أن التقدير لمثوبة لهم كما أنك إذا قلت سلاماً وحمداً علم السامع أنك تريد سلمتُ سلاماً وحمدتُ حمداً ، فإذا قلت سلام وحمد كان التقدير سلام مني وحمد مني ، وهذا وجه تنظير «الكشاف» وقرينة كون هذا المصدر في الأصل منصوباً وقوعه جواباً للو المتأصل في الفعلية ، ثم إذا سمع قوله ( خير ) علم السامع أنه خبر عن المثوبة بعد تحويلها فاستفاد ثبات الخيرية ولهذا لم يتعرض صاحب «الكشاف» لبيان إفادة الجملة ثبات الخيرية للمثوبة لأنه لصراحته لا يحتاج للبيان فإن كل جملة اسمية تدل على ثبات خبرها لمبتدئها .وبهذا ظهر الترتب لأن المقصود من الإخبار عن المثوبة بأنها خير أنها تثبت لهم لو آمنوا .وعندي وجه آخر وهو أن يقال إن قوله : { لمثوبة من عند الله خير } دليل الجواب بطريقة التعريض فإنه لما جعل معلقاً على قوله : { ولو أنهم آمنوا واتقوا } علم أن في هذا الخبر شيئاً يهمهم . ولما كانت ( لو ) امتناعية ووقع في موضع جوابها جملة خبرية تامة علم السامع أن هذا الخبر ممتنع ثبوته لمن امتنع منه شرط لو فيكون تنكيلاً عليهم وتمليحاً بهم . وقد قيل : إن ( لو ) للتمني على حد { لو أن لناكرة } [ الشعراء : 102 ] . والتحقيق أن لو التي للتمني هي لو الشرطية أشربت معنى التمني لأن الممتنع يتمنى إن كان محبوباً :وأحب شيء إلى الإنسان ما منعا ... واستدل على هذا بأنها إذا جاءت للتمني أجيبت جوابين جواباً منصوباً كجواب ليت وجواباً مقترناً باللام كجواب الامتناعية كقول المهلهل :فلو نبش المقابر عن كليب ... فيخبر بالذنائب أي زيرويوم الشعثمين لقر عيناً ... وكيف لقاء من تحت القبورفأجيب بقوله : فيخبر وقوله : لقر عيناً . والتمني على تقديره مجاز من الله تعالى عن الدعاء للإيمان والطاعة أو تمثيل لحال الداعي لذلك بحال المتمني فاستعمل له المركب الموضوع للتمني أو هو ما لو نطق به العربي في هذا المقام لنطق بالتمني على نحو ما قيل في قوله تعالى : { لعكم تتقون } [ البقرة : 21 ] ونحوه . وعلى هذا الوجه يكون قوله { لمثوبة } مستأنفاً واللام للقسم .والمثوبة اسم مصدر أثاب إذا أعطى الثواب والثواب الجزاء الذي يعطى لخير المعطي ، ويقال ثوب وأثوب بمعنى أثاب فالمثوبة على وزن المفعولة كالمصدوقة والمشورة والمكروهة .وقوله : { لو كانوا يعلمون } شرط ثان محذوف الجواب لدلالة ما تقدم عليه وحذف مفعول { يعلمون } لدلالة المثوبة من الله خير ، أي لوكانوا يعلمون مثوبة الله لما اشتروا السحر .وليس تكرير اللفظة أو الجملة في فواصل القرآن بإيطاء لأن الإيطاء إنما يعاب في الشعر دون النثر لأن النثر إنما يعتد فيه بمطابقة مقتضى الحال وفائدة هذا التكرير التسجيل عليهم بأنهم لا يعلمون ما هو النفع الحق .
Yet if only they the Jews had believed in the Prophet and the Qur’ān and been fearful of God’s chastisement by abandoning acts of disobedience towards Him such as sorcery the response to the conditional clause beginning with law ‘if’ has been omitted but it is intimated to be ‘they would have been rewarded’ and this is indicated by His following words verily a reward from God would have been better than that for which they sold themselves if they had but known that this is better they would not have preferred that over this la-mathūbatun ‘verily the reward’ is the subject; the lām is that of oaths; and min ‘indi’Llāhi khayrun ‘from God would have been better’ is the predicate.
In connection with these two verses, some commentators have reported certain Judaic traditions, which have given rise to a number of doubts, especially in the minds of Muslims with a Western orientation. Maulana Ashraf Thanavi has provided very simple and clear solutions to these exegetical problems, and we shall reproduce them here:
(1) The Jews were impertinent and senseless enough to attribute magic and sorcery to a prophet -- namely, Sayyidna Sulayman (علیہ السلام) (Solomon). So, in saying that they used to learn the black arts of the devils (Shayatin شیاطین), the Holy Qur'an takes care to deny, as a parenthesis, such a vile allegation against Sayyidna Sulayman (علیہ السلام) .
(2) These verses condemn the Jews for indulging in black magic. In connection with the verses, some commentators have reported a long and well-known story about a woman called Zuhrah زُہرہ ، which is not based on any authentic Islamic tradition. Those scholars who have found the story to be infringing the regulations of the Shari` ah, have rejected it as mere fiction; but those who believe that it can be interpreted so as to come in line with the Shari` ah, have not dismissed it totally. For the moment we are not concerned with the question whether the story is true or false. But what we would like to insist upon is the fact that a proper understanding does in no way depend on this story.
(3) The Jews knew very well that their indulgence in black magic was not only a sin, but also involved infidelity (Kufr کفر ). They could also see that such activities would do them no good even in this world, for their sorcery could not harm anyone except when Allah willed it so. Thus their practice went against their knowledge, and they made no use of their understanding to see this discrepancy. That is why the Holy Qur'an, to begin with, states that they "knew", and then goes on to negate this 'knowledge' by saying, "Only if they knew!" For, if one does neither act upon what one knows nor tries to understand it properly, one's knowledge is no better than ignorance.
(4) There was a time when black magic had grown very popular in the world, particularly in Babylon. Seeing its astonishing efficacy, ignorant people began to confuse its effects with the miracles of prophets, and to suppose that the two were identical in nature. Some even looked upon magicians as being holy men, and worthy of being obeyed; still others actually started learning and practising black magic as if it were a good deed bearing a divine sanction.25
25. Just as there has been a sudden outburst of enthusiasm for the occult sciences in the West since the middle of the sixties in this century, particularly in America where even the universities have been inundated by it.
In short, this extraordinary veneration for magic and magicians had become a potent source of misguidance. In order to eradicate this misunderstanding, Allah sent down to Babylon two angels, Harut and Marut, for informing the people as to the true nature of magic and as to its different forms, so that they should distinguish it from the miracles of prophets, and keep away from obeying magicians and practising magic themselves. Just as the prophethood of prophets is divinely confirmed through miracles, signs and rational or other arguments, in the same way the angelical nature of Harut and Marut was confirmed on the basis of different signs and arguments, so that people should listen attentively to them and follow their guidance.
This particular function was not assigned to the prophets for two reasons. Firstly, the need of the hour was to establish a distinction between the prophets and the magicians, and, the prophets being in a way a party to the dispute, it was proper that a third party should be the arbitrator. Secondly, the necessary distinction between the two could not, in a normal course, be defined without citing and reporting the verbal formulas employed in magic. Merely to report heretical speech is not in itself a heresy - this is a logical and rational principle, and the Shari'ah too accepts it. So, the prophets could have been allowed to cite these formulas; but, they being a manifestation of divine guidance, Allah did not ask them to perform such a function, and chose two angels for the purpose. For, Allah's commandments are of two kinds -- those pertaining to Takwin تکوین (creation and the cosmic order), and those pertaining to Tashri تشریع ' (legislation) -, and it is quite possible that sometimes the two may not seem to accord with each other. The order of creation is made up of good and evil both, and it is the angels through whom divine commandments are enforced. in this sphere. So, the angels are made to do things which, in the perspective of the cosmic order, always lead to general good, but which, in so far as they necessarily involve some kind of partial disorder, are seen to be evil -- for example, the growth and upkeep of a human tyrant, or of a harmful beast, each of which is right in the context of the order of creation, but wrong from the point of view of the order of legislation. On the other hand, the prophets are entrusted only with the functions of the legislative order, which are, in their general as well as particular applications, nothing but good.
Although, in view of the ultimate purpose, this reporting of the formulas of magic too was related to the legislative order, yet there was probability -- which even materialized -- that a reporting of such formulas could give an incentive to the practice of black magic. So, Allah preferred not to make the prophets even an indirect means of such reprehensible activities. All the same, the prophets too were made to serve the main purpose by announcing the basic regulations of the Shari'ah with regard to magic, though not the details pertaining to the minor rules derived from them, for that could have possibly given rise to temptation. We shall explain it through an analogy. The prophets have, for example, told us that it is forbidden to accept a bribe, and have also explained the nature of bribery, but have not given us the details as to how a bribe is given or taken, for a delineation of such minute details would have served only to teach men the different methods of giving or taking a bribe. Or, take an example from different branches of magic. If one utters a certain formula, one would, on getting up from the bed in the morning, find money under his pillow or in his pocket. The Shari` ah makes it quite clear that such a practice is not, in principle, legitimate, but does not specify what that formula is.
In short, the two angels came down to Babylon, and started the work assigned to them -- that is to say, they used to explain the basic principles of magic, its different forms and the specific formulas, and then used to dissuade the people from getting themselves involved in these activities or with the magicians. Their work was exactly like that of a scholar who, finding that illiterate people sometime fall into uttering heretical words or phrases on account of their ignorance, should collect in his speeches or writings all such phrases that have gained currency, and inform them as to what they must carefully avoid.
Now, all sorts of people started coming to the angels for seeking information about the nature and the specific formulas of a magic lest ignorance should lead them into error, in the matter of doctrines or that of deeds. In order to provide the correct teaching on this subject and to protect the people from error, the angels were scrupulous enough to make it a point to warn them of possible dangers in giving them the information. They insisted on making it quite clear that in allowing them to provide this kind of information to the people in general, Allah intended to put His servants through a trial, for He would see who uses this knowledge for protecting his 'Iman ایمان (faith) by recognizing evil and avoiding it, and who falls into misguidance by adopting evil that he has come to recognize as evil -- a choice which can easily lead one into Kufr کفر (infidelity) in the matter of deeds or in that of doctrines. The angels repeatedly advised them to seek this dangerous information only with a good intent and to remain steadfast in this good intent, and not to misuse the knowledge so as to earn perpetual damnation.
The angels could not be more honest and forthright. So, they explained the basic principles of magic and even the subsidiary details to all those who were ready to take the pledge to remain steadfast in their faith. Of course, if anyone broke the pledge and fell into transgression or infidelity, it was his own business, and the angels could not be held responsible for it. Some were true to their promise, while many did not fulfil the pledge, and made their knowledge of magic a means of doing harm to people -- this in itself is sin and transgression, while some modes of magic actually involve infidelity (Kufr کفر). Thus, through a misuse of their knowledge of magic, some turned into sinners and others into infidels.
Let us repeat that the angels had taught magic for the purpose of reforming the people and helping them to keep to the straight path, but those who misused this teaching did so out of their own perversity. An example would make the situation still more clear. Let us suppose that a man goes to a master of the Islamic sciences, who is an expert in the traditional branches of learning and in philosophy as well, and who also acts upon his knowledge, and this man requests the master to teach him philosophy, ancient or modern, so that he may protect himself against the doubts raised by the philosophers with regard to Islamic doctrines, and may also be able to give a satisfactory reply to those who raise such doubts. Apprehending that he might turn out to be insincere, and might finally bring the knowledge of philosophy to the aid of false and anti-Islamic ideas, the master warns him against such an eventuality, and the man takes a pledge that he would not misuse his knowledge. Having satisfied himself, the master gives him a thorough training in philosophy. But the man, contrary to his promise, begins to accept the anti-Islamic and false theorizing of philosophers as the truth. Obviously, in such a case, the teacher can in no way be held responsible for the way the pupil behaves. Similarly, there can be no room for doubting the integrity of these two angels.
Although Allah Himself knows how things were, yet one can suppose that once the angels had done the work assigned to them, they must have been recalled to the Heavens. (Bay an al-Qur'an)
What is Magic ? Definition and effects
Since the study of magic has been enjoying a weird currency in the Western countries since 1968, and has sometimes been accepted as a part of academic research, we had better consider the subject at some length from the Islamic point of view. According to the authoritative Arabic dictionary "Al-Qamus القاموس ", the word Sihr سحر (Magic) signifies an effect the cause of which is not apparent, whether the cause may actually lie in something which possesses a luminous quality (as the effect of certain phrases), or in things with an extra-sensory reality (as the effect produced by jinns and devils), or in the power of imagination (as the effect of hypnotism), or in things which are sensory yet hidden (as a magnet drawing to itself a piece of iron, when the magnet is concealed from the onlookers; or the effect of drugs, when they have been furtively administered; or the influence of stars and planets). The causes at work being numerous, the forms of magic too are numerous.
Magic and Charms
In everyday language, magic signifies those practices which involve the cooperation of jinns and devils, or the exercise of the power of imagination, or the use of certain words or phrases. It is a rationally established proposition, accepted by ancient philosophers and by some of the modern ones as well, and equally confirmed by observation and experiment, that words and phrases in themselves possess a certain efficacy, and that when certain letters, words or phrases are recited or written down for a specified number of times, they pro-duce certain specific results. Similar results are obtained by employing human hair or nails or the clothes worn by the person concerned, etc. - a practice which is usually described as the preparation of "Charms". All such things are commonly known as magic.
Sihr سحر or Magic جادو : The Islamic view
But in the terminology of the Holy Qur'an and the Hadith, Sihr سحر (magic جادو) refers to all those usual happenings which have been brought about with the active help of the devils (Shayatin شیاطین ), won over through certain practices likely to please them. There are several ways of pleasing the devils. Sometimes one sings the praises of the devils, and sometimes recites formulas of a heretical nature which deny Allah or associate others with Him.
The worship of stars and planets too gladdens their heart, as do certain evil deeds - for example, preparing a charm with the blood of a person killed unlawfully, or refusing to adopt the prescribed modes of purifying one's body, or living constantly and deliberately in a state of uncleanliness and impurity. Just as the aid of the angels can be won only through those modes of speech and action which they like (for example, remembrance of Allah, fear of Him and obedience to His commandments, cleanliness and purity, avoidance of all kinds of dirtiness, physical or otherwise, and good deeds in general), similarly the co-operation of the devils can be obtained through those modes of speech and action which are pleasant to them. That is why only those are successful in the practice of black magic who are habitually unclean and impure, avoid required purification and remembrance of Allah, and are given to all kinds of evil deeds - for example, it is usually during the period of menstruation that women become effective in the practice of black magic. So much for black magic or sorcery in the exact sense of the term. As for sleights of hand, mesmerism, hypnotism, or the tricks of jugglers, they are sometimes described as magic only by an extension of the meaning of the word, or metaphorically. (Ruh al-Ma'ani)
Kinds of Magic
In his "Mufradat al-Qur'an مفردات ", Imam Raghib al-Isfahani (رح) says that there are several kinds of magic. Firstly, there are sleights of hand, like those of jugglers, which deceive the eyes of the onlookers, but have no further substance. Then, there are ways of influencing the imagination of others through the concentration of one's own powers of thought so that they begin to see or feel things which do not really exist as happens in mesmerism or hypnotism. Such a result is sometimes obtained with the help of the devils (Shayatin) too. In speaking of the magicians of the Pharaoh فرعون ، the Holy Qur'an says: سَحَرُوا أَعْيُنَ النَّاسِ They cast a spell on the eyes of the people" (7:116). Or, in another place: يُخَيَّلُ إِلَيْهِ مِن سِحْرِهِمْ أَنَّهَا تَسْعَ "Through their magic Moses came to think that they (ropes turned into serpents) were running about" (20:66). Obviously, this piece of magic had to do with influencing of the imagination. The second of these verses employs a verb which has the same root as the noun Khayal خیال (thought), and hence clearly states that the ropes and the wands cast down by the magicians had neither turned serpents nor made any movement, but the imagination of Sayyidna Musa (Moses علیہ السلام) had been affected so as to see them running about in the shape of serpents. The Holy Qur'an also indicates the other way of influencing men's imaginations which involves the help of the devils (Shayatin شیاطین):"
هَلْ أُنَبِّئُكُمْ عَلَىٰ مَن تَنَزَّلُ الشَّيَاطِينُ ﴿221﴾ تَنَزَّلُ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ أَفَّاكٍ أَثِيمٍ ﴿222﴾
Shall I tell you on whom the devils descend? They descend on all those who are slanderers and sinners." (26:221-222)
Still another kind of magic is that which can change the very nature of a thing - for example, turning a man into a beast or into a stone. Scholars like Imam Raghib al-Isfahani and Abu Bakr al-Jasas رحمۃ اللہ علیہما deny that magic can totally change the nature of a thing, but confine the efficacy of magic only to influencing the imagination and to deceiving the eyes of the onlookers. This is also what the Mu'tazilah thought of the matter. But most of the scholars hold that neither the Shari` ah nor any rational argument forbids the possibility of trans-substantiation or the changing of one thing into another, like a living body turning into a stone. As for the well-known principle of the classical philosophers that the change of the "essences" (Haqa`'iq حقأیق) is not possible, it concerns the "essences" of the three categories - the Impossible, the Possible and the Necessary --, for, rationally speaking, it just cannot be that something impossible should become possible, or that something possible should become impossible. And as to the Holy Qur'an putting down the magic of the Egyptian sorcerers as only an impact on the imagination, it does not necessarily mean that all the forms of magic should be no more than an influencing of the imagination. Moreover, certain scholars have seen an argument in favour of the possibility of trans-substantiation through magic in a saying of Ka` b al-Ahbar, reported by Imam Malik (رح) in his Muwatta' مؤطاء on the authority of Qa'qa' ibn Hakim: "Were it not for these phrases which I recite regularly, the Jews would have changed me into a donkey." "A donkey" is, no doubt, a usual metaphor for "a fool." But it is not proper to turn away, unnecessarily, from the literal meaning to a metaphorical one. So, the sentence means just what it says - that if the recitation of the phrases had not protected him, the Jewish sorcerers would have changed him into a donkey. The saying, thus, establishes two things. Firstly, it is possible to change a man into a donkey; secondly, the phrases he used to recite had the property of making the magic of the sorcerers lose its efficacy. On being asked what these phrases were, the scholar Ka'b al-Ahbar taught his listeners the following words of prayer:
اعوذ باللہ العظیم الذی لیس شیٔ اعظم منہ و بکلمات التامات التی لا یجاورھن بَرّولا فاجرو باسماء اللہ الحسنٰی کلھا ما علمت منھا ومالم اعلم من شرّماخلق وبرّوذرء (اخرجہ فی المؤطا، باب التعوذعند النوم)
"I seek the protection of Allah the Great, greater than whom there is none; and I seek the protection of the perfect words of Allah which no man, virtuous or wicked, can even transcend; and I seek the protection of all the Beautiful Names of Allah, those of them which I know and those which I do not know, from the evil of everything which Allah has created, to which He has given existence, and which He has spread (over the earth or the universe)."
To sum up, all the three forms of magic are possible, and can manifest themselves in actual fact.
Miracles
Now, let us turn to another important aspect of the question. Through prophets and saints certain events come into manifestation which normally and habitually never happen, and are hence designated as Kharq al-Adah خرق العادہ (contrary to the habitual). The Islamic term for the miracles of prophets is Mu’ jizat معجزات ، and for those of saints, Karamat کرامات . The effects produced by such miracles are in appearance sometimes similar to those produced by magic. This external resemblance leads some ignorant people to confuse the one with the other, and they begin to have a reverence for magicians which is totally out of place. So, one must understand the difference between the two clearly.26
26. Editorial Note on; معجزہ :Mu` jizah or Miracle: For all the unusual
events and unprecendented happenings the English language has but one word, 'Miracle' which makes it impossible for the reader in that language to mark the subtle difference in various forms of miracles. Briefly, therefore, the different forms of miracles with their distinct objections are explained here. It is hoped that this will help the readers have a clearer conception of Mu’ jizah.
These terms are used in Arabic language to define and differentiate the unprecendented happenings and here each of them is explained, so as to clearly differentiate them. Qualitatively, there is, apparently no difference in all of them.
Mu’ jizah is the unusual event which occurs at 'the hands of a prophet. It is purely an act of Allah. A prophet's own volition has no part in the working of it. For those who witness a Mu’ jizah it is compulsory to believe in it.
Karamah (کرامۃ) -- another mode of unusual happenings > is also an act of Allah; it appears at the hands of a Man of Allah (ولیُ اللہ ،). The basic difference in Mu’ jizah and Karamah is that one who performs Mu’ jizah, addresses himself as a prophet, a Man of. Allah has no such claim. In both Mu jizah and Karamah the usual cause and effect link is absent. Things happen but without any cause; and there is usually a total transformation of the nature and behaviour of objects in Mu’ jizah and Karamah. at is required is a generalized belief in them. Allah chooses whoever He wills for Mu’ jizah and Karamah. No degree of stringent discipline can give the power to make the unusual happen.
Irhas ارھ اس) ) is also a kind of Karamah. It heralds the coming of a prophet. It usually occurs at the hands of the one who is closely related to the prophet: the unprecedented happenings in the the life of Mariam (علیہا السلام) ، mother of prophet ` Isa (علیہ السلام) or the various unusual events that began occurring to and around Aminah -- the blessed mother of our Holy Prophet ﷺ ; for instance, she had no pangs of birth, towards the close of the birth period she used to hear stranger voices greeting her, although she saw no one. It is compulsory to believe in such events of Irhas as have been mentioned in the Qur'an and believe in a general manner, that Irhas is usually associated with the coming of a prophet.
The Difference between Miracle and Magic
The miracles of prophets and saints are different from magic, firstly, in their respective natures, and, secondly, with regard to the signs and indications attendant upon each. As for the difference in their natures, it lies in the fact that the results produced through magic depend on the law of causality as much as do the ordinary and usual events in the physical world, the only distinction being that the causes are in the latter case quite clear or easily observable, while in the former they are different for a common man to detect. Where the causes are evident, the effects are immediately referred back to them, and the events thus produced are not considered to be astonishing, but where the causes are hidden or obscure, the events produced by them arouse wonder and amazement, and those who are ignorant of the causes readily come to believe that the things have happened in contravention of the habitual laws of the physical universe.27 What these people do not realize is that such happenings are as much due to certain causes as the habitual events - the cause in the case of extraordinary happenings often being the activity of a jinn or a devil (Shaytan). For example, a letter suddenly falls in front of a man, and on reading it he finds that the letter has been written just this day and is coming from a distance of ten thousand miles. Now, the onlookers would call it a "supernatural" event, for they do not know that Allah has given the power of doing such things to jinns and devils. Once one comes to understand the means through which things of this nature take place, one would no longer see them as "supernatural", or even as being contrary to "habit". In short, all the results obtained through magical practices are, in fact, due to the operation of physical causes, but in the eyes of common people they acquire the illusory appearance of "supernatural" events, simply because the operative causes are hidden from them.
27. In the West, they describe such events as being "supernatural", although the Latin word Natura, which is the equivalent of the Greek word Phusis, does, at least in its original sense, cover all that has been created, whether it lies in the domain studied by empirical science or beyond it.
On the other hand, miracles happen directly under divine command without the intervention of physical causes. For example, the Holy Qur'an tells us how the tyrant Namrud نمرود (Nimrod) threw Sayyidna Ibrahim (Abraham علیہ السلام) into a blazing fire, and how Allah commanded the fire to grow cold for him, but not so cold as to do him harm -- and the fire obeyed the command, and, instead of scorching him, provided a place of safety.
This was a direct divine act, and hence a miracle. Now, we sometimes hear of men who, having applied certain chemicals to their body, can enter a fire without being scorched. This is not a miracle, for the operative cause is of a physical nature - that is, the chemicals. These chemicals are not known to people in general, and they are deluded into believing such a performance to be a °°supernatural" event going beyond the realm of "the habitual". The Holy Qur'an itself leaves no doubt as to a miracle being directly an act of Allah Himself. In the Battle of Badr بدر ، the Holy Prophet ﷺ took up a handful of pebbles, and threw them at the army of the infidels, which blinded their eyes. Referring to this miracle, the Holy Qur'an says: مَا رَمَيْتَ إِذْ رَمَيْتَ وَلَـٰكِنَّ اللَّـهَ رَمَىٰ ۚ:"When you threw (the pebbles), it was not you who threw, but Allah who threw (them) " (8:17). The statement is explicit enough, and means that the miraculous result produced by a handful of pebbles was not the work of the Holy Prophet ﷺ ، but the act of Allah Himself.
Miracle and Magic: How to distinguish between them?
Having explained the difference between the nature of a miracle and that of magic, we must now turn to another important question --the results produced by each of them being in appearance the same, how is the common man to know the difference between the two? In fact, Allah has given to each certain characteristic features which can help the common man to distinguish miracles from magic. Firstly, miracles are manifested through those whom everyone knows to be clean in body, pure in deeds and God-fearing. On the contrary, magic shows its effectiveness through those who are unclean in body, dirty in deeds, shunning the worship of Allah and His remembrance. This is a distinction which everyone can observe with his own eyes. Secondly, Allah has so ordained things that if a man pretends to be a prophet and claims to perform miracles, and yet tries to practise magic, his magic is never effective, but he can be effective in magic so long as he does not lay a claim to prophethood.
Magic جادو and Prophets (علیہم السلام)
As to the question whether magic can have an effect on prophets, we shall say that it can. As we have explained above, magic operates through physical causes, and prophets are not immune to the influence of physical causes. Just as they feel the effects of hunger and thirst, fall ill and get healed through the operation of apparent physical causes, in the same way they can be affected by the hidden operations of magic, which are no less physical. Let us add that being affected by magic does in no way go against the dignity of the station of prophethood -- no more than would thirst or hunger. Authentic ahadith report that the Holy Prophet ﷺ was affected by the magic spell cast by the Jews, that he came to know of it through revelation, and that he took certain measures to free himself of its effects. The Holy Qur'an too tells us how Sayyidna Musa (علیہ السلام) (Moses) experienced the effects of magic when the sorcerers cast a spell on his eyes, and the ropes and the sticks thrown by them began to look like running serpents, so that he was really frightened (20:66, 67).
Injunctions of the Shari'ah with regard to Magic
As we have already said, Sihr جادو (magic), in the terminology of the Holy Qur'an and the Hadith, refers only to those practices in which one seeks the help of jinns and devils (Shayatin شیاطین ) by gaining their pleasure through the adoption of certain phrases or actions that involve infidelity (Kufr کفر ) and association (Shirk شرک ) or sin and transgression, and thus brings about certain extraordinary and unusual events. The magic of Babylon, mentioned in the Holy Qur'an, was just this, and it is this form of magic which it condemns as infidelity or Kufr (Jassa). According to Abu Mansur, the most valid and correct view in this respect is that each and every form of magic does not, unconditionally and absolutely, constitute infidelity, but only that form which employs actions or speech contrary to the tenets of faith ('Iman ایمان ). (Ruh al-Ma'ani)
As everyone knows, the Holy Qur'an and the Hadith repeatedly enjoin upon the Muslims to consider the Shayatin شیطان as one's enemies, to hate them and to curse them. Seeking to please them and to win their friendship, in contravention of such clear commandments, is in itself a sin. Moreover, they are pleased only when one indulges in Kufr کفر (infidelity) or Shirk شرک (association), and thus forfeits one's faith ('Iman ایمان ) altogether, or at least in disobedience and transgression, displeasing Allah and His angels by wallowing in dirt and impurity -- which becomes an additional sin. And if one makes use of magic for doing some harm to a human being unlawfully, it is still one more sin.
Thus, what the Holy Qur'an and the Hadith call Sihr جادو can never be free either of infidelity in the matter of faith, or at least of infidelity in the matter of actions. If, in order to please the Shayatin شیطان ، one adopts actions or speech involving infidelity or association, one would be committing an act' of real infidelity in the matter of faith; and even if one manages to avoid infidelity and association in speech or action, but indulges in other sinful activities, one would not remain free from infidelity in the matter of actions. This is what the Holy Qur'an means when, in the present verses, it designates magic as Kufr کفر .
To sum up, when magic employs actions or speech involving infidelity (such as seeking the help of Shayatin شیاطین ، or believing the stars and the planets to be effective in themselves, or claiming prophethood by presenting the results of magical procedures as miracles, etc), such a magic, according to the consensus, constitutes infidelity; and when magic does not involve acts of infidelity but only the commission of sinful acts, such a magic is a major sin.
Now, let us add some subsidiary injunctions with regard to magic.
(1) Since magic is not usually free from infidelity in the matter of faith or in that of action, it necessarily follows that it is forbidden to learn or teach or practice it. Some jurists, however, allow one to learn magic for the purpose of protecting Muslims from harm, but one must not try to learn more than is necessary.
(2) If in preparing charms and amulets the help of Jinns and Shayatin شیاطین has been sought, they too come under the category of Sihr جادو ، and are thus forbidden. If the words employed in the charms are vague, and one does not exactly know what they mean but suspects that they are invocations addressed to idols or Shayatin شیاطین ، even such charms are forbidden.
(3) As for the other forms of magic beside the Sihr جادو ، like that of Babylon, condemned by the Holy Qur'an and the Hadith, if they involve Kufr and Shirk in some way, they too are forbidden.
(4) If there is a form of magic which employs words or actions or other elements to which the Shari` ah does not object, then it is permissible on condition that it is not used for a purpose which the Shari'ah forbids.
(5) It is permissible to use the verses of the Holy Qur'an, or the Divine Names or the words of the Hadith in preparing charms and amulets, or as a recitation or invocation for gaining divine help in order to attain a desired end. But if such a use of the sacred texts or words is made for a reprehensible purpose, like doing harm to someone without an excuse, even that is forbidden. (Shami, Fatawa Qadi Khan)
A doctrinal point
Verse 102 says: "They could not thus do any harm to anyone, except with the permission of Allah". This shows that causes in themselves and by themselves cannot produce the effects one usually associates with them, and it is Allah who creates the effects as much as the causes. (Bayan al-Qur'an)
When superstition and apathy set in in the declining Jewish race, certain individuals exploited this tendency in order to make commercial gains, by providing success-seekers with magical prescriptions. To make their business flourish, these unscrupulous profiteers attributed their art to Solomon, saying that the extraordinary powers he exercised over the spirits and winds were, in fact, based on his knowledge of magic, and claimed that this knowledge had been passed on to them by the spirits. This claim to authority accounted in great measure for the rapid spread of sorcery, which soon developed into a highly popular art among the Jews. When angels came to Lot’s people, who were practising homosexuals, they came in the garb of handsome boys in order to test them. Similarly, angels were sent to the Jews in Babylon in the garb of holymen to teach them magic, at the same time making it quite clear that they were only putting the Jews to the test, this being a form of knowledge that should not be practised. But the Jews took no heed of this warning: they practised magic with great fervour and even used it for illicit ends.