Mushaf View — Surah 2 2:135
About this view. Tafsir al-Tabari, al-Qurtubi, and al-Baghawi — three of the most chain-citing classical Sunni mufassirun — have never been fully translated into English. ParallelQuran's English Mushaf view shows the five most-complete English-language Sunni tafsirs available today. The Arabic Mushaf view (Phase 2) will show the full classical stack.
Muhammad bin Ishaq reported that Ibn `Abbas said that `Abdullah bin Suriya Al-A`war said to the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, "The guidance is only what we (Jews) follow. Therefore, follow us, O Muhammad, and you will be rightly guided." Also, the Christians said similarly, so Allah revealed,
وَقَالُواْ كُونُواْ هُودًا أَوْ نَصَـرَى تَهْتَدُواْ
(And they say, "Be Jews or Christians, then you will be guided.") Allah's statement,
قُلْ بَلْ مِلَّةَ إِبْرَهِيمَ حَنِيفًا
(Say (to them O Muhammad ), "Nay, (we follow) only the religion of Ibrahim, Hanif) means, "We do not need the Judaism or Christianity that you call us to, rather,
مِلَّةَ إِبْرَهِيمَ حَنِيفاً
((we follow) only the religion of Ibrahim, Hanif) meaning, on the straight path, as Muhammad bin Ka`b Al-Qurazi and `Isa bin Jariyah stated. Also, Abu Qilabah said, "The Hanif is what the Messengers, from beginning to end, believed in.")
قال محمد بن إسحاق: حدثني محمد بن أبي محمد حدثني سعيد بن جبير أو عكرمة عن ابن عباس قال: قال عبدالله بن صوريا الأعور لرسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: ما الهدى إلا ما نحن عليه فاتبعنا يا محمد تهتد. وقالت النصارى مثل ذلك فأنزل الله عز وجل" وقالوا كونوا هودا أو نصارى تهتدوا" وقوله "قل بل ملة إبراهيم حنيفا" أي لا نريد ما دعوتمونا إليه من اليهودية والنصرانية بل نتبع "ملة إبراهيم حنيفا" أي مستقيما قاله محمد بن كعب القرظي وعيسى ابن جارية وقال خصيف عن مجاهد مخلصا وروى علي بن أبي طلحة عن ابن عباس حاجا وكذا روى عن الحسن والضحاك وعطية والسدي وقال أبو العالية: الحنيف الذي يستقبل البيت بصلاته ويرى أن حجه عليه إن استطاع إليه سبيلا وقال مجاهد والربيع بن أنس: حنيفا أي متبعا وقال أبو قلابة: الحنيف الذي يؤمن بالرسل كلهم من أولهم إلى آخرهم وقال قتادة: الحنيفية شهادة أن لا إله إلا الله يدخل فيها تحريم الأمهات والبنات والخالات والعمات وما حرم الله عز وجل والختان.
Allah mentioned after this the dispute of the Jews and Christians with the believers, saying: (And they say) i.e. the Jews: (Be Jews) you shall be guided from error (or Christians) and the Christians also say the same, (then ye will be rightly guided. Say) to them, O Muhammad: it is not as you claim: (Nay, but the religion of Abraham, the upright) the Muslim; rather follow the religion of Abraham, the upright, the Muslim, the sincere-only then you will be guided, (and he was not of the idolaters) i.e. he did not follow the religion of the Jews or Christians.
الظاهر أنه عطف على قوله : { ومن يرغب عن ملة إبراهيم إلا من سفه نفسه } [ البقرة : 130 ] ، فإنه بعد أن ذمهم بالعدول عن تلقي الإسلام الذي شمل خصال الحنيفية بين كيفية إعراضهم ومقدار غرورهم بأنهم حصروا الهدى في اليهودية والنصرانية أي كل فريق منهم حصر الهدى في دينه .ووجه الحصر حاصل من جزم { تهتدوا } في جواب الأمر فإنه على تقدير شرط فيفيد مفهوم الشرط أن من لم يكن يهودياً لا يراه اليهود مهتدياً ومن لم يكن نصرانياً لا يراه النصارى مهتدياً أي نفوا الهدى عن متبع ملة إبراهيم وهذا غاية غرورهم .والواو في قال عائدة لليهود والنصارى بقرينة مساق الخطاب في { أم كنتم شهداء } [ البقرة : 133 ] وقوله : { ولكم ما كسبتم } [ البقرة : 134 ] .و ( أو ) في قوله : { أو نصارى } تقسيم بعد الجمع لأن السامع يرد كلاً إلى من قاله ، وجزم { تهتدوا } في جواب الأمر للإيذان بمعنى الشرط ليفيد بمفهوم الشرط أنكم إن كنتم على غير اليهودية والنصرانية فلستم بمهتدين .جردت جملة ( قل ) من العاطف لوقوعها في مقام الحوار مجاوبة لقولهم { كونوا هوداً أو نصارى تهتدوا } على نحو ما تقدم أي بل لا اهتداء إلا باتباع ملة إبراهيم فإنها لما جاء بها الإسلام أبطل ما كان قبله من الأديان .وانتصب ( ملة ) بإضمار تتبع لدلالة المقام لأن { كونوا هوداً } بمعنى اتبعوا اليهودية ، ويجوز أن ينصب عطفاً على { هوداً } والتقدير بل نكون ملة إبراهيم أي أهل ملته كقول عدي بن حاتم لما وفد على النبيء صلى الله عليه وسلم ليسلم : " إني من دين أو من أهل دين " يعني النصرانية .والحنيف فعيل بمعنى فاعل مشتق من الحنف بالتحريك وهو الميل في الرجل قالت أم الأحنف ابن قيس فيما ترقصه به :والله لولا حنف برجله ... ما كان في فتيانكم من مثلهوالمراد الميل في المذهب أن الذي به حنف يميل في مشيه عن الطريق المعتاد . وإنما كان هذا مدحاً للملة لأن الناس يوم ظهور ملة إبراهيم كانوا في ضلالة عمياء فجاء دين إبراهيم مائلاً عنهم فلقب بالحنيف ثم صار الحنيف لقب مدح بالغلبة . والوجه أن يجعل ( حنيفاً ) حالاً من ( إبراهيم ) وهذا من مواضع الاتفاق على صحة مجيء الحال من المضاف إليه ولك أن تجعله حالاً لملة إلا أن فعيلاً بمعنى فاعل يطابق موصوفه إلا أن تؤول ملة بدين على حد { إن رحمة الله قريب من المحسنين } [ الأعراف : 56 ] أي إحسانه أو تشبيه فعيل إلخ بمعنى فاعل بفعيل بمعنى مفعول .وقد دلت هذه الآية على أن الدين الإسلامي من إسلام إبراهيم .وقوله : { وما كان من المشركين } جملة هي حالة ثانية من إبراهيم وهو احتراس لئلا يغتر المشركون بقوله : { بل ملة إبراهيم } أي لا نكون هوداً ولا نصارى فيتوهم المشركون أنه لم يبق من الأديان إلا ما هم عليه لأنهم يزعمون أنهم على ملة إبراهيم وإلا فليس ذلك من المدح له بعد ما تقدم من فضائله وهذا على حد قوله تعالى : { وما صاحبكم بمجنون } غلط فيه صاحب «الكشاف» غلطاً فاحشاً كما سيأتي .
And they say ‘Be Jews or Christians the particle aw is for detail; the first of these is the saying of the Medinan Jews while the second is that of the Christians of Najrān and you shall be guided’. Say to them ‘Nay we follow rather the creed of Abraham a hanīf hanīfan is a circumstantial qualifier referring to Ibrāhīma that is to say one that inclines away from all other religions to the upright religion; and he was not of the idolaters’.
The earlier verses have defined the religion (Millat مِلَّت of Sayyidna Ibrahim (علیہ السلام) and established that its present form is Islam. Now, the Jews and the Christians, in spite of their pretension to be his followers, did not in actual fact follow his religion. Each of these two groups, instead of accepting Islam, used to ask the Muslims to accept its own religion in order to find true guidance. No doubt, each of these two religions was, in its own time and for its own time, a genuine religion, but in its present form each had become distorted, and had also been abrogated by Allah. So, in answer to them, Allah asks the Holy Prophet $ to declare on his own behalf and on that of his followers that they are and shall remain steadfast in the religion of Sayyidna Ibrahim (علیہ السلام) who shunned all kinds of association (Shirk شرک), who adored nothing but the One God and obeyed no one but Him, and whose religion, therefore, did not have even a trace of distortion. Then, in the second of these verses Allah asks the Muslims to declare the basic tenets of this religion too, which are as follows:- (1) Muslims believe in Allah and in the guidance which He has sent them through the Holy Prophet ﷺ (2) They also believe in all the prophets sent by Allah from time to time - some of whom have been mentioned in this verse. (3) Some of the prophets may in some ways be superior to others, but it is essential for a Muslim to believe in all the prophets without making any distinction. (4) Muslims believe that the Shari` ah of all the prophets mentioned here were instituted by Allah Himself, but they have now been abrogated. So, Muslims follow the Shari'ah of the Holy Prophet ﷺ ، for this alone is now valid. (5) Muslims ultimately obey Allah alone, and submit themselves totally to Him.
In the second of these verses the progeny of Sayyidna Ya` qub (علیہ السلام) (Jacob) has been described as Asbat اسباط or "tribes." The reason is that he had twelve sons, and the offspring of each son came to form a tribe. Allah so blessed his seed that in Egypt, Sayyidna Yusuf (علیہ السلام) (Joseph) and his brothers made up a group of twelve men, but their lineage flourished, and when the Israelites left Egypt along with Sayyidna Musa (علیہ السلام) (Moses), their number ran into thousands. Another form of this blessing was that the progeny of Sayyidna Ya` qub (علیہ السلام) included a large number of prophets.
The religion that the Prophet Muhammad taught was the religion of the Prophet Abraham, the very religion to which the Jews and the Christians claimed allegiance. Why was it, then, that they turned away from the Prophet Muhammad? The reason for this was that the religion brought by the Prophet, taught people to take on the hue of God; to devote themselves to Him entirely. With the People of the Book, religion had a different meaning. For them religion was reduced to a symbol of national pride. The message brought by the Prophet hurt their pride, so they turned against him. Those who consider their own race superior to others cannot accept the truth when it manifests itself in some nation other than their own. They would believe in prophets who came from amongst their own people, but not in those who appeared among other people outside their own community. The only personalities that they acknowledged were those who belonged to their own race. Those who look at religion as worship of God, on the other hand, recognize the truth of every piece of wisdom that God sends down, no matter who teaches it. For the theologians to realize that the Prophet was God’s final messenger was not a matter of insuperable difficulty. There was nothing to prevent them from seeing the truth of his religion. They should have proclaimed what, deep down in their hearts, they knew to be true. But they did not accept him as the final prophet, as was enjoined by God, for the simple reason that they were more concerned about their own position and prestige. Just as the people of old received their just deserts as individuals, so will latter-day generations receive what they merit on their own account, for truth is an individual, not an ancestral matter. The mistake of the People of the Book was to think that contemporary and succeeding generations would be rewarded for the good deeds of their ancestors. The idea of original sin held by Christians implied that sins were handed down from one generation to the next. Such beliefs have no basis in truth. Everyone will be rewarded by God according to his or her own personal actions; no one can be held responsible for the deeds of others.