The Dawn, Daybreak 89:5

هَلْ فِي ذَٰلِكَ قَسَمٌ لِّذِي حِجْرٍ
Hal fee thalika qasamun lithee hijrin
65 Translations
is this oath strong enough for a rational person
Are there not in them (above oaths) sufficient proofs for the people of understanding?
Indeed in that there is an oath for a man of sense
Is there not an evidence in this for those who have sense
Is there not in this a (sufficient) oath for a man of reason?
is there not in that an oath for the intelligent?
Is there an oath in that for one possessing intellect
Is there not in that a solemn oath for one endowed with reason (to reflect upon, so that it may guide him to the truth and keep him away from evils)
In it there is surely a strong evidence for one who has sense and understanding
Is there in that an oath for a mindful man
Is there an oath in that for one who has understanding?
Indeed in all these oaths there are subjects of thought for the thinkers
Is there not in these an oath for those who understand
is there in that a sworn oath for whoever has a mind?
Is there in that an oath for a man of sense
Why is there an oath in this, for the intelligent
Is there any need for oath in this for anyone with understanding?
Is there not in this an oath formed with understanding
Is there not in these a lesson (evidence or admonition) for a man of understanding
Is there in that an oath for the mindful
Is there not in this an oath becoming a man of sense
Is in (all) this an evidence or testimony for a possessor of wisdom
Is there not in that an oath to be sworn for a possessor of intelligence?
In these, can evidence not be found by those with understanding?
Is there not in these an oath (enough evidence) for those who use their common sense
Is there in this an oath for one endowed with understanding
Truly in this is an oath for men of understanding
For one who has sense, these (items) are surely worth being sworn by.
Is there in this an oath for one with understanding?
Surely, in that is a mighty oath for the wise
In this is an oath for the one with intelligence
Is there in that an oath for he who is confined?
Is there in that an oath for one with intelligence?
Is in that an oath to (those) of (E) a mind
Considering all this - could there be, to anyone endowed with reason, a [more] solemn evidence of the truth
Is there in that an oath for a sensible person? (Literally: person owning sense)
There surely is an oath for thinking man
Is this not a sufficient oath for intelligent people
__Is there (not) in such an oath (enough assurance) for a man of sense?_
Is this not a sufficient oath for highly intelligent one?
Is there a (more solemn) vow for the sensible ones
Is this not a sufficient oath for highly intelligent one?
Is there not enough assertion in these corroboratory facts for those who ponder
Isn’t there a convincing oath for an intelligent person?
Is all this ˹not˺ a sufficient oath for those who have sense?
Does this contain an oath for those of understanding?
Is there not in this a mighty oath for a man of sense
A profound oath, for one who possesses intelligence
is there not in [all] that an oath for a rational person?
is there not in [all] that an oath for a rational person?
Is there within that an oath for a possessor of a mentality?
Is there not in that an oath for a man of sense?
Is not all this a solemn evidence for every thinking person
Truly in that there is an oath for those who possess understanding
Is there not in it strong evidence for one possessed of understanding
is there an oath therein for one who is mindful
Is there (not) in these a Sign for those who understand
Is there in this an oath for a man of sense?
Is there in this an oath for a rational person
is there in these an oath to those of understanding?
Is there not an oath in this for a thinking person
Is there [not] in [all] that an oath [sufficient] for one of perception
Is there in that an oath for a possessor of understanding?
Is there (not) in these an adjuration (or evidence) for those who understand
Is there (not) in these an adjuration (or evidence) for those who understand